Can I have some advice please on how to classify the attached subjective (account codes ) please
2 posters
Page 1 of 1
Can I have some advice please on how to classify the attached subjective (account codes ) please
Can I have some advice please on how to classify the attached subjective (account codes ) please.
I think I can see what the issue is re our large non pay figure!!! Should these subjectives be mainly coded as INDRE?
I am out of the office today and would like to try and update this early next week.
Regards
Neil Galbraith
Finance Manager
Costing, Pricing, PLICS & SLR
Re: Can I have some advice please on how to classify the attached subjective (account codes ) please
INDER is the cost output that is used only as part of overhead allocation process. To be completely honest with you I think that it was included into the template by mistake. Please don't use it. I will make sure that it is removed in the updated version
Kind regards
Dmitry
Kind regards
Dmitry
Re: Can I have some advice please on how to classify the attached subjective (account codes ) please
Hi Dmitry
Thanks for the clarification on INDIRE.
Another reason for our large overhead figure is Research & Training costs. I classified these as overheads and then RANDD & TRAIN on our workbook. The RANDD & TRAIN have been substitued with OHCOR in the output!
To me, these costs and their income streams are NOT patient care, hence I claassified them as overheads. If I had done the same to income it would not have been such a large issue.
I think we need:
1. a clear defintion of what each of the cost area and cost outputs are meant to capture please.
2. what combinations are permissable. E.g. Overhead and RANDD
Regards
Neil
Thanks for the clarification on INDIRE.
Another reason for our large overhead figure is Research & Training costs. I classified these as overheads and then RANDD & TRAIN on our workbook. The RANDD & TRAIN have been substitued with OHCOR in the output!
To me, these costs and their income streams are NOT patient care, hence I claassified them as overheads. If I had done the same to income it would not have been such a large issue.
I think we need:
1. a clear defintion of what each of the cost area and cost outputs are meant to capture please.
2. what combinations are permissable. E.g. Overhead and RANDD
Regards
Neil
Neil Galbraith- Posts : 3
Join date : 2015-11-19
Location : Oxford
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|